The questions we hear most from HSE managers, asset integrity engineers, and procurement teams at their first technical review.
How do you validate the technology if there are no completed projects?
The structural engineering methodology is based on established codes — EN 1993 (Eurocode 3) for steel structures, with load calculations per applicable UAE wind zone standards. The protection concept follows the same engineering principles used in mesh-based barrier systems, debris containment structures, and industrial impact barriers across multiple industries. Our pilot project approach is designed precisely to generate documented, verified performance data under your site conditions — with full transparency of engineering assumptions and results. The first pilot becomes the proof of concept, and the basis for any scale-up decision. We do not ask for commitment beyond the pilot until that validation is complete.
Who performs the structural calculations?
Structural calculations are performed by qualified structural engineers with experience in steel framework design and industrial facility engineering. Basic engineering calculations are prepared at Stage 2 and reviewed with the client's technical team before proceeding to detailed design. Full detailed calculations — including connection design, foundation sizing, and load analysis — are produced at Stage 3, after project approval. Documentation is provided in a format suitable for client engineering review and, where required, third-party verification.
What specific threats does the system protect against?
The system is designed against defined threat classes — characterised by impactor mass, velocity, and approach angle — rather than against a specific drone model. This is the correct engineering approach: as drone technology evolves, model-specific design becomes obsolete. The threat class is agreed with the client at the concept stage, based on their risk assessment and site context. Two standard threat classes are defined — Class M (Operational: 5–15 kg, 25–40 m/s) and Class H (Enhanced: up to 30 kg, up to 50 m/s). The system operates through controlled deformation, offset 2.5–3.0 m from the tank — absorbing and redistributing energy, not stopping threats like a wall. The system can also be designed against a custom threat class if the client's security assessment defines specific parameters.
Does the system affect the tank's structural integrity or warranty?
No. The protection system is entirely independent — steel columns on separate reinforced concrete foundations with no structural connection to the tank shell or roof. No loads are transferred to the tank structure under any operating condition. The tank's original structural design, inspection regime, and manufacturer warranty are completely unaffected. This independence is a fundamental design requirement, not a feature — it ensures the tank remains within its original design envelope throughout the protection system's service life.
What happens if the system takes a hit — does it damage the tank?
The structural framework is designed to absorb and distribute impact energy to its own independent foundations — completely bypassing the tank. In the event of an impact within the design envelope, the mesh and structural elements deform in a controlled manner, dissipating energy before it can reach the tank shell or roof equipment. Damaged mesh panels can be replaced without removing the structural framework, and the system can be returned to full operation quickly. The tank remains operational throughout.
Can the system be installed on a tank that is currently in service?
Yes. This is a core design requirement. All installation work is bolt-assembly — no welding, no cutting, no grinding. No hot work permits are required. Foundation works proceed around the tank perimeter without interrupting operations. Column erection, ring beam installation, dome assembly, and mesh installation all proceed while the tank remains in full service. Typical installation timeline for a single 10,000 m³ tank is 4 to 6 weeks.
How do we start — what is the minimum commitment?
The minimum commitment is a Stage 1 concept assessment — a confidential site review, threat class discussion, and protection level recommendation. This is a low-cost, low-commitment entry point that produces a clear technical and commercial basis for a pilot decision. We recommend starting with a single pilot tank to validate performance under your specific site conditions before committing to broader deployment. No detailed engineering expenditure is required until the pilot scope and budget are agreed.